4.7 Article

Salivary and serum β2-microglobulin and gamma-glutamyl-transferase in patients with primary Sjogren syndrome and Sjogren syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 334, Issue 1-2, Pages 225-231

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00162-1

Keywords

beta 2-microglobulin; gamma-glutamyl-transferase; Sjogren syndrome; systemic lupus erythematosus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Sialochemistry has been proposed as a simple and useful tool for the diagnosis of Sjogren syndrome (SS). Although many changes have been detected in several constituents of saliva from patients with SS, none are individually sensitive or specific enough for diagnosing SS. The aim of this study was to assess the value of the combined determination of beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) and gamma-glutamyl-transferase (GGT) activity in serum and saliva as a diagnostic instrument for differentiating primary and secondary [to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)] SS patients from normal subjects. Methods: Nineteen primary SS (pSS) patients, 15 patients with SS secondary to SLE, and 25 SLE patients without SS were studied. Thirty healthy subjects were included in the study as control group. Results: By means of a mathematical model, (a) 84.1%, (b) 85.7%. and (c) 87.0% of patients were correctly classified as SS or normal when (a) salivary beta2m and GGT values, (b) serum beta2m and salivary GGT values, and (c) salivary beta2m and GGT along with serum beta2m values, respectively, were considered. To differentiate between pSS and sSS by means of the mathematical model, the combination of serum beta2m and salivary GGT values achieved that 81.8% of the patients were correctly classified. Conclusion: Since sialochemistry is an easy, safe and reliable test, the combined determination of beta2m and GGT in saliva and serum was useful for differentiating SS patients from normal subjects, but not excessively good for differentiating pSS from sSS patients. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available