4.7 Article

Soil-geomorphology relations in gypsiferous materials of the Tabernas Desert (Almeria, SE spain)

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 115, Issue 3-4, Pages 193-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00012-0

Keywords

gypsic horizon; semi-arid environment; badlands; DEM; terrain attributes; soil micromorphology; crusting

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A detailed pedological study in an apparently homogeneous badlands area of gypsiferous mudstones in the Tabernas Desert (Almeria, SE Spain), with an annual precipitation of 200 mm, has been shown to be composed of different soil units belonging to different stages of soil development. Twenty-four soil profiles in four topographic transects within a small instrumented catchment have been described and analysed, along with over 100 probings and observations. A complementary approach to ascertain the relationships of soil-units with topography made use of a 1-m resolution digital elevation model (DEM) and derived terrain attributes. Moreover, the relationships with soil cover, surface hydrology and erosion have all contributed to understanding pedogenic and evolutionary processes. The five soil units identified correspond to distinct topographic positions, from steep S-oriented slopes with incipient soil development under bare surfaces (Epileptic Regosol), to moderately sloping, N-oriented soils, fairly well developed below a dense cover of annual and perennial plants (Haplic Calcisol). Both the spatial distribution and the topographic position of soil units favour gypsum and salt washing processes and gypsum accumulation is restricted to higher positions with very small contributing areas and minimum overland flow and thus reduced leaching. Gypsic horizons and Gypsisols, while previously described in the area associated to gypseous rock outcrops, are now described associated to gypsiferous mudstones. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available