4.3 Article

Two algorithms to estimate fractal dimension of gray-level images

Journal

OPTICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 2452-2464

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.1585061

Keywords

digital textured image; fractal theory; Hausdorff dimension; fractal dimension; box-counting method

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fractal dimension is a fascinating feature highly correlated with the human perception of surface roughness, and has been successfully applied to texture analysis, segmentation, and classification. Several approaches have been developed to estimate the fractal dimension. Among them, the box-counting (BC) method is nonstochastic and popular in estimating the fractal dimension of a two-tone image. The differential box-counting (DBC) method, a generalization of the classical BC method, was proposed to compute the fractal dimension for a 2-D gray-level image. However, the classical BC and the DBC methods have several major drawbacks, such as overcounting and undercounting the number of boxes. Hence, the real value of the fractal dimension cannot be reached. In this work, two algorithms that can obtain more accurate estimates of the fractal dimension are proposed. The first one, a modified algorithm of the DBC method, is called the shifting DBC (SDBC) algorithm, and the second one is called the scanning BC (SBC) algorithm. We theoretically prove that the SDBC algorithm approaches the estimated value closer to the exact fractal dimension than the DBC method. Simulation results show that the two proposed algorithms can resolve the drawbacks that the BC and the DBC methods possess. Compared to the DBC method, the two proposed algorithms consistently give more satisfactory results on synthetic and natural textured images. (C) 2003 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available