Journal
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 407-412Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.032
Keywords
Cerebrovascular accident; Coronary circulation; Exercise; Rehabilitation; Stroke
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research [HHS5R21HD40988]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: To compare the effects of 3 different exercise training regimens on cardiorespiratory fitness and coronary risk factor reduction in subjects with unilateral stroke. Design: A cluster assignment by residential location repeated-measures design. Setting: University-based medical center. Participants: Fifty-five subjects with unilateral ischemic stroke were assigned to the following groups: intensity (n = 18), duration (n = 19), and therapeutic exercise (n = 18). Intervention: A 14-week intervention with subjects randomized to 1 of 3 interventions: (1) moderate intensity, shorter duration (MISD) exercise (gradually increasing exercise intensity while keeping exercise duration constant at 30 min), (2) low-intensity, longer duration (LILD) exercise (gradually increasing duration to 60 min while keeping exercise intensity constant), or (3) conventional therapeutic exercise (TE) consisting mainly of strength, balance, and range of motion activities. All groups exercised 3 days per week. Main Outcome Measures: Peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)peak), submaximal oxygen consumption (Vo(2)), lipid panel, and resting blood pressure. Results: The MISD group attained more favorable effects on systolic (P<.04) and diastolic blood pressure (P<.002) and total cholesterol (TC) (P<.036) compared with LILD and TE groups. Both MISD (P<.029) and LILD (P<045) showed significant reductions in triglycerides compared with TE (P<.029). There was no significant change in Vo(2)peak and submaximal Vo(2) in any of the groups. Conclusions: Overall, both MISD and LILD conditions achieved greater clinical and significant gains in coronary risk reduction compared with TE.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available