4.6 Article

Personal Bankruptcy After Traumatic Brain or Spinal Cord Injury: The Role of Medical Debt

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 413-419

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.031

Keywords

Brain injuries; Health care costs; Insurance, health; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Funding

  1. Royalty Research Fund of the University of Washington
  2. intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of medical debt among traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) patients who discharged their debts through bankruptcy. Design: A cross-sectional comparison of bankruptcy filings of injured versus randomly selected bankruptcy petitioners. Setting: Patients hospitalized with SCI or TBI (1996-2002) and personal bankruptcy petitioners (2001-2004) in western Washington State. Participants: Subjects (N = 186) who filed for bankruptcy, comprised of 93 patients with previous SCI or TBI and 93 randomly selected bankruptcy petitioners. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Medical and nonmedical debt, assets, income, expenses, and employment recorded in the bankruptcy petition. Results: Five percent of randomly selected petitioners and 26% of petitioners with TBI or SCI had substantial medical debt (debt that accounted for more than 20% of all unsecured debts). SCI and TB I petitioners had fewer assets and were more likely to be receiving government income assistance at the time of bankruptcy than controls. SCI and TBI patients with a higher blood alcohol content at injury were more likely to have substantial medical debts (odds ratio=2.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-7.00). Conclusions: Medical debt plays an important role in some bankruptcies after TBI or SCI. We discuss policy options for reducing financial distress after serious injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available