4.6 Article

Implanted Electrical Stimulation of the Trunk for Seated Postural Stability and Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Single Case Study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 340-347

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.029

Keywords

Activities of daily living; Electric stimulation; Posture; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Funding

  1. National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the US Department of Education [H 133N060017]
  2. National Institutes of Health [N01-NS-1-2333, R01-NS040547]
  3. Rehabilitation Research and Development Service of the US Department of Veterans Affairs [B6406]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [ULI-RR024989]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To explore and quantify the physical and functional effects of stabilizing the torso with electrical stimulation of the paralyzed hip and trunk musculature after motor complete tetraplegia. Design: Single-subject case study with repeated measures and concurrent controls. Setting: Academic outpatient rehabilitation center. Participants: Forty-four-year-old man with C4 American Spinal Injury Association grade A tetraplegia 20 years post-spinal cord injury. Intervention: A surgically implanted multichannel pulse generator and intramuscular stimulating electrodes to activate lumbar erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, and gluteus maximus muscles bilaterally. Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes assessed with and without stimulation included (1) spinal alignment and pelvic orientation, (2) pulmonary function and ventilatory volumes, (3) forward bimanual reaching distance, (4) seated stability and resistance to externally applied disturbances, (5) maximal force and speed of rowing-like movements, and the ability to (6) independently return to an erect seated position from full forward or lateral flexion and (7) roll in bed without assistance. Results: Stimulation improved spinal convexity and kyphosis by 26 degrees and 21 degrees, reduced posterior pelvic tilt by 11 degrees, increased forced expiratory volume and vital capacity by 10% and 22%, and improved forward reach by more than 7cm. Average resistance to sagittal disturbances increased by more than 40% (P<002), and mean force exerted during underhanded pulling more than doubled (P=.014) with stimulation. Restoration of upright sitting in both sagittal and coronal planes and bed turning was made possible through appropriately timed activation of the hip and trunk muscles. Conclusions: A neuroprosthesis for controlling the paralyzed torso can positively impact spinal alignment, seated posture, pulmonary function, trunk stability, and reach. Stimulation of hip and trunk muscles can improve performance of activities of daily living as well as enable independent wheelchair and bed mobility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available