4.6 Article

Patterns of Recovery of Posttraumatic Confusional State in Neurorehabilitation Admissions After Traumatic Brain Injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages 1749-1754

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.05.011

Keywords

Brain injuries; Confusion; Rehabilitation

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Education National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research [H133A020514, H133A070043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To provide preliminary descriptions of patterns of resolution of symptoms of acute confusion after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective, descriptive, cohort Study. Setting: Inpatient neurorehabilitation unit. Participants: Patients (N=107) meeting criteria for posttraumatic confusional state at admission to inpatient rehabilitation. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Patterns of resolution of posttraumatic confusional state symptoms over the first 3 confusion assessment protocol evaluations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe confusion. Results: Posttraumatic confusional state symptoms resolving earliest were psychotic-type symptoms, decreased daytime arousal, and nighttime sleep disturbance. Fluctuation and cognitive impairment were the 2 most persistent symptoms. Seventy-three percent of patients showed improvement of I or more symptoms from the first to third evaluation. Confusion severity groups did not significantly differ on indices of injury severity (Glasgow Coma Scale score, time to follow commands) but did differ on functional status at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Conclusions: While posttraumatic confusional state is a heterogeneous disorder, there is a predictable pattern of symptom resolution. Differences in patients' confusion severity and patterns of symptoms may relate to differing underlying neural injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available