4.6 Article

Treatment disparities for disabled medicare beneficiaries with stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 595-601

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.042

Keywords

disabled persons; lung cancer; medicare; rehabilitation

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA100029] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare initial treatment and survival of nonelderly adults with and without disabilities newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. Design: Retrospective analyses; population-based cohorts. Setting: Eleven Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries. Participants: Persons with disability Medicare entitlement (n=1016) and nondisabled persons (n=8425) ages 21 to 64 years when diagnosed with stage 1, pathologically confirmed first primary non-small cell lung cancer between January 1: 1988, and December 31, 1999. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Initial cancer treatments (surgery, radiotherapy), survival (through December 31, 2001). Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression estimated adjusted associations of disability status with treatments and survival. Results: Persons with disabilities were much more likely to be male, non-Hispanic black, and not currently married. Although 82.2% of nondisabled persons had surgery, 68.5% of disabled persons received operations. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) of receiving surgery were especially low for persons with respiratory disabilities (adjusted RR=.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], .67-.85), nervous system conditions (adjusted RR=.86; 95% CI, .76-.98), and mental health and/or mental retardation disorders (adjusted RR=.92; 95% CI, .86-.99). Persons with disabilities had significantly higher cancer-specific mortality rates (hazard ratio [HR]=1.37; 95% CI, 1.24-1.51) than persons without disabilities. Observed differences in cancer mortality persisted after adjusting for demographic and tumor characteristics (adjusted relative HR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.39). Further adjustment for surgery use eliminated statistically significant differences in cancer mortality between persons with and without disabilities across disabling conditions. Conclusions: Persons with disabilities were much less likely than nondisabled Medicare beneficiaries to receive surgery; statistically significant cancer-specific mortality differences disappeared after accounting for these treatment differences. Future research must explore reasons for these findings and whether survival of disabled Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer could improve if surgical treatment disparities were eliminated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available