4.6 Article

Ethnic differences in discharge destination among older patients with traumatic brain injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 231-236

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.143

Keywords

elderly; ethnic groups; head injuries; rehabilitation

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01-AG024806, K02 AG019736, R01 AG031178-02, R01 AG031178, R01 AG024806-04, R01 AG024806, K02-AG019736, K02 AG019736-05] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [K01 HD046682-04, K01 HD046682, K01-HD046682] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To estimate the association between ethnicity and discharge destination in older patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: A retrospective analysis. Setting: Nationally representative sample of older patients from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation in 2002 and 2003. Participants: Patients (N=9240) aged 65 years or older who received inpatient rehabilitation services for TBI. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Discharge destination (home, assisted living facility, institution) and ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic). Results: Multinomial logit models showed that older Hispanics (odds ratio [OR]=2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-3.02) and older blacks (OR=2; 95% CI, 1.55-2.59) with TBI were significantly more likely to be discharged. home than older whites with TBI, after adjusting for relevant risk factors. Older blacks were also 78% less likely (OR=.22; 95% CI, .08-.60) to be discharged to an assisted living facility than whites after adjusting for relevant risk factors. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that older minority patients with TBI were significantly more likely to be discharged home than white patients with TBI. Studies are needed to investigate underlying factors associated with this ethnic difference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available