4.7 Article

Stereospecific interactions of proline residues in protein structures and complexes

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 331, Issue 4, Pages 925-940

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00759-9

Keywords

proline; aromatic residues; hydrogen bonding; helix capping; protein-protein interaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The constrained backbone torsion angle of a proline (Pro) residue has usually been invoked to explain its three-dimensional context in proteins. Here we show that specific interactions involving the pyrrolidine ring atoms also contribute to its location in a given secondary structure and its binding to another molecule. It is adept at participating in two rather non-conventional interactions, C-H...pi and C-H...O. The geometry of interaction between the pyrrolidine and aromatic rings, vis-a-vis the occurrence of the C-H...pi interactions has been elucidated. Some of the secondary structural elements stabilized by Pro-aromatic interactions are beta-turns, where a Pro can interact with an adjacent aromatic residue, and in antiparallel beta-sheet, where a Pro in an edge strand can interact with an aromatic residue in the adjacent strand at a non-hydrogen-bonded site. The C-H groups at the C-alpha and C-delta positions can form strong C-H... O interactions (as seen from the clustering of points) and such interactions involving a Pro residue at C' position relative to an alpha-helix can cap the hydrogen bond forming potentials of the free carbonyl groups at the helix C terminus. Functionally important Pro residues occurring at the binding site of a protein almost invariably engage aromatic residues (with one of them being held by C-H...pi interaction) from the partner molecule in the complex, and such aromatic residues are highly conserved during evolution. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available