4.5 Article

Analysis of eighteen antidepressants, four atypical antipsychotics and active metabolites in serum by liquid chromatography:: a simple tool for therapeutic drug monitoring

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1570-0232(03)00393-3

Keywords

therapeutic drug monitoring; antidepressants; antipsychotics; atypical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Therapeutic drug monitoring necessitates efficient, fast and reliable analytical methods validated by external quality control. We therefore devised an isocratic reversed-phase HPLC method with ultraviolet detection and optimised this to quantify mirtazapine, reboxetine, moclobemide, venlafaxine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, norfluoxetine. sertraline. citalopram, armtriptyline, nortriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, doxepin, nordoxepin, clomipramine, norclomipramine, trimipramine, mianserine, maprotiline, normaprotiline, amisulpride, clozapine, norclozapine, quetiapine. risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone in human serum. After solid-phase extraction of the drugs and metabolites, the chromatographic separation was achieved on a Nucleosil 100-Protect 1 column with acetonitrile-potassium dihydrogenphosphate buffer as mobile phase. The method was validated for therapeutic and toxic serum ranges. A linear relationship (r>0.998) was obtained between the concentration and the detector signal. Recoveries were between 75 and 99% for the drugs and metabolites. The accuracy of the quality control samples, expressed as percent recovery, ranged from 91 to 118%; intra- and inter-assay-relative standard deviations were 0.9-10.2% and 0.9-9.7%, respectively. Additional external quality control is carried out since 3 years. This method is applicable to rapidly and effectively analyze serum or plasma samples for therapeutic drug monitoring of about 30 antidepressants and atypical antipsychotics. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available