4.3 Article

Effects of hormone replacement therapy on ocular function in postmenopause

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.GME.0000063568.84134.35

Keywords

hormone replacement therapy; menopause; eye; ocular function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effect of hormone replacement therapy on climacteric ocular complaints, lacrimal secretion, intraocular pressure (IOP), and corneal thickness. Design: A prospective, controlled, randomized study on 50 healthy women (mean age 53.4 +/- 3.8 years) at least 1 year after spontaneous menopause. Twenty-five women (group A) were treated with transdermal 17beta-estradiol (50 mug/day) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg/day) for 12 days per cycle. Twenty-five untreated women (group B) were used as a control group. All participants underwent eye examination at the beginning of the study and after 3 and 6 months of therapy to detect ocular diseases and to measure lachrymal secretion, IOP, and corneal thickness. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups at the beginning of the study. After 3 and 6 months of treatment, we observed a significant reduction in the percentage of women in group A affected by ocular symptoms and in the severity of symptomatology in comparison with baseline and with group B (P < 0.01). A significant increase of both basal and stimulated lachrymal secretion was observed after 3 months of therapy in group A in comparison with baseline (P < 0.01). There was a significant decrease of IOP (P < 0.01) after 3 months of therapy in group A (P < 0.01), and a slight, nonsignificant increase of corneal thickness was observed in group A at 3 and 6 months in comparison with basal values. Conclusion: Our data suggest that hormone replacement therapy may exert a beneficial effect on ocular symptomatology, increase lachrymal secretion, reduce IOP, and increase corneal thickness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available