4.4 Article

Differential contribution of reticulospinal cells to the control of locomotion induced by the mesencephalic locomotor region

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 1714-1727

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00202.2003

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In lampreys as in other vertebrates, the reticulospinal (RS) system relays inputs from the mesencephalic locomotor region ( MLR) to the spinal locomotor networks. Semi-intact preparations of larval sea lamprey were used to determine the relative contribution of the middle (MRRN) and the posterior (PRRN) rhombencephalic reticular nuclei to swimming controlled by the MLR. Intracellular recordings were performed to examine the inputs from the MLR to RS neurons. Stimulation of the MLR elicited monosynaptic excitatory responses of a higher magnitude in the MRRN than in the PRRN. This differential effect was not attributed to intrinsic properties of RS neurons. Paired recordings showed that at threshold intensity for swimming, spiking activity was primarily elicited in RS cells of the MRRN. Interestingly, cells of the PRRN began to discharge at higher stimulation intensities only when MRRN cells had reached their maximal discharge rate. Glutamate antagonists were ejected in either nucleus to reduce their activity. Ejections over the MRRN increased the stimulation threshold for evoking locomotion and resulted in a marked decrease in the swimming frequency and the strength of the muscle contractions. Ejections over the PRRN decreased the frequency of swimming. This study provides support for the concept that RS cells show a specific recruitment pattern during MLR-induced locomotion. RS cells in the MRRN are primarily involved in initiation and maintenance of low-intensity swimming. At higher frequency locomotor rhythm, RS cells in both the MRRN and the PRRN are recruited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available