3.8 Article

Maternal obesity and infant heart defects

Journal

OBESITY RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages 1065-1071

Publisher

NORTH AMER ASSOC STUDY OBESITY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.146

Keywords

BMI; congenital malformations; pregnancy outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study determined whether obese women have an increased risk of cardiovascular defects in their offspring compared with average weight women. Research Methods and Procedures: In a case-control study, prospectively collected information was obtained from Swedish medical health registers. The study included 6801 women who bad infants with a cardiovascular defect and, as controls, all delivered women (N = 812,457) during the study period (1992 to 2001). Infants with chromosomal anomalies or whose mothers had pre-existing diabetes were excluded. Obesity was defined as BMI >29 kg/m(2), and morbid obesity was defined as BMI >35 kg/m(2). Comparisons were made with average weight women (BMI = 19.8 to 26 kg/m(2)). Results: In the group of obese mothers, there was an increased risk for cardiovascular defects compared with the average weight mothers [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95% Cl, 1.09 to 1.27], which was slightly more pronounced for the severe types of cardiovascular defects (adjusted OR = 1.23; 95% Cl, 1.05 to 1.44). With morbid obesity, the OR for cardiovascular defects was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.22 to 1.64), and for severe cardiovascular defects, the OR was 1.69 (95% Cl, 1.27 to 2.26). There was an increased risk for all specific defects studied among the obese women, but only ventricular septal defects and atrial septal defects reached statistical significance. Discussion: In this sample, a positive association was found between maternal obesity in early pregnancy and congenital heart defects in the offspring. A suggested explanation is undetected type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy, but other explanations may exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available