4.5 Article

Respiratory survival mechanisms in acetylcholinesterase knockout mouse

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 1419-1427

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02867.x

Keywords

acetylcholine; bambuterol; butyrylcholinesterase; respiration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cholinergic neurotransmission ensures muscle contraction and plays a role in the regulation of respiratory pattern in the brainstem. Inactivation of acetylcholinesterase (ACNE) by organophosphates produces respiratory failure but ACNE knockout mice survive to adulthood. Respiratory adaptation mechanisms which ensure survival of these mice were examined in vivo by whole body plethysmography and in vitro in the neonatal isolated brainstem preparation. ACNE(-/-) mice presented no ACNE activity but unaffected butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activity. In vivo, bambuterol (50-500 mug/kg s.c.) decreased BChE activity peripherally but not in brain tissue and induced apnea and death in adult and neonate ACNE(-/-) mice without affecting littermate ACNE(+/+) and (+/-) animals. In vitro, bath-applied bambuterol (1-100 muM) and tetraisopropylpyrophosphoramide (10-100 muM) decreased BChE activity in the brainstem but did not perturb central respiratory activity recorded from spinal nerve rootlets. In vitro, the cholinergic agonists muscarine (50-100 muM) and nicotine (0.5-10 muM) induced tonic activity in respiratory motoneurons and increased the frequency of inspiratory bursts in AChE(+/+) and (+/-) animals. These effects were greatly attenuated in AChE(-/-) animals. The results suggest that, in mice lacking ACNE, (i) BChE becomes essential for survival peripherally but plays no critical role in central rhythm-generating structures and (ii) a major adaptive mechanism for respiratory survival is the down-regulated response of central respiratory-related neurons and motoneurons to muscarinic and nicotinic agonists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available