4.7 Article

Asthma phenotypes and the use of biologic medications in asthma and allergic disease: The next steps toward personalized care

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages 299-311

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.1871

Keywords

Asthma phenotypes; biologic therapies; eosinophils; IgE; IL-4; IL-5; IL-13; T(H)2/type 2 inflammation

Funding

  1. Amgen
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Pfizer
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Novartis
  7. ICON
  8. Sanofi Aventis
  9. Genentech

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditionally, asthma and allergic diseases have been defined by broad definitions and treated with nonspecific medications, including corticosteroids and bronchodilators. There is an increasing appreciation of heterogeneity within asthma and allergic diseases based primarily on recent cluster analyses, molecular phenotyping, biomarkers, and differential responses to targeted and nontargeted therapies. These pioneering studies have led to successful therapeutic trials of molecularly targeted therapies in defined phenotypes. This review analyzed randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of molecularly targeted therapies in defined allergic disease and asthma phenotypes. IgE was the first successful biological target used in patients with allergic disease and asthma. This review shows that therapies targeting the canonical type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 have shown consistent efficacy, especially in asthmatic patients with evidence of T(H)2/type 2 inflammation (type 2 high). As of yet, there are no successful trials of targeted therapies in asthmatic patients without evidence for type 2 inflammation. We conclude that further refinement of type 2 therapies to specific type 2 phenotypes and novel approaches for patients without type 2 inflammation are needed for asthma and allergic disease treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available