4.5 Article

Enhancing mechanical properties of tissue-engineered constructs via lysyl oxidase crosslinking activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 66A, Issue 3, Pages 513-521

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10021

Keywords

tissue engineering; vascular grafts; lysyl oxidase; gene therapy; ECM; biomechanics

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL-60485] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of strategies have been investigated to enhance the mechanical stability of engineered tissues. In this study, we utilized lysyl oxidase (LO) to enzymatically crosslink extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, particularly collagen and elastin, to enhance the mechanical integrity of the ECM and thereby impart mechanical strength to the engineered tissue. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were liposomally transfected with the LO gene. Both Northern and Wester analyses confirmed increased LO expression. Increased LO activity was demonstrated using a fluorescent enzyme substrate assay and by observation of the presence of increased levels of desmosine, a product of LO crosslinking, in the ECM. The mechanical effects of altered crosslink densities within tissue-engineered constructs were demonstrated in a VSMC-populated collagen gel model. When smooth muscle cells transfected with lysyl oxidase were seeded in collagen gels, the tensile strength and elastic modulus in these constructs increased by approximately two-fold compared to constructs seeded with mock-transfected VSMCs. Also, desmosine levels in the LO-populated collagen gels were higher than they were in mock-seeded gels, as demonstrated via immunohistochernical staining. Compositional analysis of the ECM deposited by the transformed cells showed similar collagen and elastin levels, and cell proliferation rates were similar as well, thus attributing increased mechanical properties to ECM crosslinking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available