4.5 Article

Neuron-specific enolase is an effective tumour marker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 311-320

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5002(03)00232-0

Keywords

non-small cell lung cancer; neuron-specific enolase; tissue polypeptide antigen; carcinoembryonic antigen; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is a well known marker of small cell lung cancer. The present study was designed to assess the clinical value of NSE ill non-small cell. lung cancer (NSCLC), as compared to that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue potypeptide antigen (TPA). Methods: The study comprised 448 new consecutive NSCLC patients seen from 1996 to 2001. A set of 30 anthropometric, clinical, physical, laboratory, radiological, and pathological variables was prospectively recorded for all. patients. Patients were carefully followed-up, and their subsequent clinical course recorded. Results: Increased values of NSE were present in 32% of the patients. Bivariate analyses showed that NSE, TPA and CEA were significantly correlated with each other, lactate dehydrogenase, tumour diameter, and disease extent. Univariate analyses showed that patients with elevated concentration of both NSE and TPA had significantly shorter survivals than patients with low values (30 [95% Cl: 25-35] vs. 61 weeks [46-76], and 30 [Cl: 24-36] vs. 59 weeks [40-79], respectively, P = 0.0000). The Cox proportional hazards model including all the 22 variables significant in univariate analysis selected, in decreasing order of significance, the following variables: (1) N factor; (2) main treatment; (3) ECOG PS; (4) CNS metastasis; (5) age; (6) tumour cavitation; (7) NSE; (8) T factor; and (9) adrenal gland metastasis. Conclusions: This data indicates that serum assay of NSE is a useful marker also in NSCLC and a significant predictor of survival, independently of the other prognostic factors. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available