4.4 Article

Natural history and clinical behavior of Crohn's disease extending beyond two decades

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 216-219

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200309000-00005

Keywords

Crohn's disease; natural history; disease behavior; Vienna classification; disease site

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crohn's disease is a heterogeneous inflammatory disorder characterized by strictures or perforating complications. Information on natural history is limited. In the present study, 150 patients with long-standing Crohn's disease, including 81 females and 69 males, were seen continuously by a single clinician for at least 20 years. Additional retrospective data were available extending for >40 years and 13 have now died, usually with an advanced malignancy. To evaluate disease expression, phenotypic clinical characteristics defined by the 1998 Vienna classification for Crohn's disease were used and included age at diagnosis, location of disease, and disease behavior at the time of diagnosis or 10 years or 20 years after diagnosis. Most patients were initially diagnosed before the age of 40 years (94%) and had ileocolonic disease (65.3%). At diagnosis, both females and males were most often classified with inflammatory disease (nonstenosing, nonpenetrating); however, over the course of the disease, particularly in the first decade, decreased numbers of patients with inflammatory disease and increased numbers with penetrating disease were seen. In addition, some with stenosing disease eventually developed penetrating disease. Disease localized to ileum alone was most often complicated by stricture formation, whereas ileocolonic disease was usually complicated by a penetrating complication. This shift in disease behavior indicates that Crohn's disease is a dynamic process that phenotypically evolves and progresses with time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available