4.7 Article

Decelerating flows in TeV blazars: A resolution to the BL Lacertae-FR I unification problem

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 594, Issue 1, Pages L27-L30

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/378557

Keywords

galaxies : active; quasars : general; radiation mechanisms : nonthermal; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TeV emission from BL Lacertae (BL) objects is commonly modeled as synchrotron self-Compton radiation from relativistically moving homogeneous plasma blobs. In the context of these models, the blob Lorentz factors needed to reproduce the TeV emission corrected for absorption by the diffuse infrared background are large (delta greater than or similar to 50). The main reason for this is that stronger beaming eases the problem of the lack of similar toIR-UV synchrotron seed photons needed to produce the deabsorbed similar tofew TeV peak of the spectral energy distribution. However, such high Doppler factors are in strong disagreement with the unified scheme, according to which BLs are FR I radio galaxies with their jets closely aligned to the line of sight. Here, motivated by the detection of subluminal velocities in the subparsec-scale jets of the best studied TeV blazars, Mrk 421 and Mrk 501, we examine the possibility that the relativistic flows in the TeV BLs decelerate. In this case, the problem of the missing seed photons is solved because of upstream Compton scattering, a process in which the upstream energetic electrons from the fast base of the flow see the synchrotron seed photons produced in the slow part of the flow relativistically beamed. Modest Lorentz factors (Gamma similar to 15), decelerating down to values compatible with the recent radio interferometric observations, reproduce the similar tofew TeV peak energy of these sources. Furthermore, such decelerating flows are shown to be in agreement with the BL-FR I unification, naturally reproducing the observed BL/FR I broadband luminosity ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available