Journal
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 66A, Issue 3, Pages 605-614Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10585
Keywords
mechanotaxis; durotaxis; microfabrication; cell patterning; extracellular matrix
Funding
- NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 60692] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Adherent cells are strongly influenced by the mechanical aspects of biomaterials, but little is known about the cellular effects of spatial variations in these properties. This work describes a novel method to produce polymeric cell culture surfaces containing micrometer-scale regions of variable stiffness. Substrates made of acrylamide or poly(dimethylsiloxane) were patterned with 100- or 10-mum resolution, respectively. Cells were cultured on fibronectin-coated acrylamide caving Young's moduli of 34 kPa and 1.8 kPa, or fibronectin-coated PDMS having moduli of 2.5 MPa and 12 kPa. Over several days, NIH/3T3 cells and bovine pulmonary arterial endothelial cells accumulated preferentially on stiffer regions of substrates. The migration, not proliferation, of cells in response to mechanical patterning (mechanotaxis) was responsible for the accumulation of cells on stiffer regions. Differential remodeling of extracellular matrix protein on stiff versus compliant regions was observed by immunofluorescence staining, and may have been responsible for the observed mechanotaxis. These results suggest that mechanically patterned substrates might provide a general means to study mechanotaxis, and a new approach to patterning cells.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available