4.6 Article

Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH):: prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 505-511

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00378-0

Keywords

cervical cancer treatment; laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the survival of cervical cancer patients treated with laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH). We quantify morbidity and correlate survival with known risk factors. Methods. Between August 1994 and June 2002, 200 patients with cervical cancer (TNM stage lal, Ll n = 6, la2 n = 21, lb1 n = 89, lb2 n = 26, 2a n = 11, 2b n = 45, 3a n = 1, 4 n = 1; squamous cell carcinoma 76.5%, adenocarcinoma 23.5%) were treated with LARVH (type II n = 102, type III n = 98). Results. Paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 170 (85%) patients and pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in all 200 patients. In 26 (13%) patients positive lymph nodes were found. Major intraoperative injuries occurred in 6% of patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 8% of patients. Incidence of complications decreased significantly when comparing the first half with the second half of patients. After a median follow-up time of 40 months, overall 5-year survival could be projected to 83%; 18.5% of patients experienced recurrence with 35% exclusively extrapelvic and 11% of patients died of recurrence. Independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival were tumor stage, lymph node status, and combined involvement of lymphovascular and angiovascular space. In the absence of these risk factors projected 5-year survival was 98%. Conclusion. Patients with tumor <4 cm, negative lymph nodes, and the absence of the combination of angio- and lymphovascular space involvement can be identified by laparoscopic staging and are ideal candidates for LARVH. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available