3.9 Article

Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
Volume 162, Issue 7, Pages 649-657

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.162.7.649

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the associations between demographic and diabetes management variables and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of youths with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Design: Cross-sectional study. Settings: Selected populations in Ohio, Washington, South Carolina, Colorado, Hawaii, and California; health service beneficiaries in 3 American Indian populations; and participants in the Pima Indian Study in Arizona. Participants: Two thousand four hundred forty-five participants aged 8 to 22 years in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Main Outcome Measure: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores. Results: Among youths with type 2 DM, HRQOL was lower compared with those with type 1. Among those with type 1 DM, worse HRQOL was associated with a primary insurance source of Medicaid or another government-funded insurance, use of insulin injections vs an insulin pump, a hemoglobin A(1c) value of at least 9%, and more comorbidities and diabetes complications. There was a significant age X sex interaction, such that, in older groups, HRQOL was lower for girls but higher for boys. For youths with type 2 DM, injecting insulin at least 3 times a day compared with using an oral or no diabetes medication was associated with better HRQOL, and having 2 or more emergency department visits in the past 6 months was associated with worse HRQOL. Conclusions: Youths with types 1 and 2 DM reported HRQOL differences by type of treatment and complications. The significant age X sex interaction suggests that interventions to improve HRQOL should consider gender differences in diabetes adjustment and management in different age groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available