4.5 Article

Lymphovascular Invasion in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma A Study of 22 Cases

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages 635-639

Publisher

COLL AMER PATHOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0463-OA

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context.-Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) is a known aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma. However, the reasons for its aggressiveness remain unclear. Objective.-To investigate the frequency of lymphovascular invasion in 22 cases of MPUC. Design.-Consecutive tissue sections were stained with D2-40 and CD34 to highlight lymphovascular channels associated with MPUC. Spaces containing tumor cells were scored as positive for lymphovascular invasion if the staining pattern on immunohistochemistry was distinct and circumferential. Results.-Of 22 cases, 21 (95%) had lymphovascular invasion on immunohistochemical staining, with 91% lymphatic invasion and 4% vascular invasion. Interestingly, 8 cases were originally signed out as negative for lymphovascular invasion on the basis of hematoxylineosin-stained sections; of these, 7 (88%) had focal lymphovascular invasion evident on immunohistochemical staining. Conclusions.-Our results confirm that micropapillary lacunae are not lymphovascular channels. However, nearly all MPUC tumors (95% in this series) have evidence of lymphovascular invasion by immunohistochemical analysis. Our data support the use of micropapillary features as a morphologic marker for lymphovascular invasion and MPUC as an adverse histologic type of urothelial carcinoma. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:635-639; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0463-OA)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available