4.7 Article

Systemic administration of the potent mGlu8 receptor agonist (S)-3,4-DCPG induces c-Fos in stress-related brain regions in wild-type, but not mGlu8 receptor knockout mice

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 473-483

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00200-4

Keywords

dicarboxyphenylglycine; mGlu8 receptor; metabotropic glutamate receptor; c-Fos; superior colliculus; central nucleus of amygdala

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of a novel and potent metabotropic glutamate 8 (mGlu8) receptor agonist, (S)-3,4-dicarboxyphenylglycine (DCPG), was studied in vivo in mouse brain. c-Fos expression was used as a marker of neuronal activity in specific brain regions 2 It after systemic (S)-3,4-DCPG (3-100 mg/kg, i.p.). The selectivity of (S)-3,4-DCPG on mGlu8 receptors was determined in mGlu8 receptor knockout mice. In wild-type mice, (S)-3,4-DCPG (100 mg/kg) significantly increased c-Fos expression in several stress-related brain regions: paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, central nucleus of the amygdala, lateral parabrachial nucleus and locus coeruleus. In the central nucleus of the amgydala, more than 92% of c-Fos positive neurons were identified as GABAergic inhibitory neurons after (S)-3,4-DCPG. Moreover, (S)-3,4-DCPG significantly induced c-Fos in the superficial gray layer of the superior colliculus, a central visual region. c-Fos expression was unchanged by (S)-3,4-DCPG in mGlu8 receptor knockout mice. Our results indicate that systemic (S)-3,4-DCPG alters neuronal excitability in specific brain regions via mGlu8 receptor. The prominent activation of stress areas suggests a role for mGlu8 receptors in the central integration of stress responses. Furthermore, our results indicate that systemic (S)-3,4-DCPG can be used as a tool to explore behavioral and cellular consequences of mGlu8 receptor activation. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available