4.7 Article

On the impact of urban surface exchange parameterisations on air quality simulations: the Athens case

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 37, Issue 30, Pages 4217-4231

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00564-8

Keywords

urban boundary layer; urban surface exchange parameterisation; mesoscale models; photochemical models; coastal air pollution; sea breezes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most of the standard mesoscale models represent the dynamic and thermodynamic surface exchanges in urban areas with the same technique used for rural areas (based on Monin-Obukhov similarity theory and a surface energy budget). However it has been shown that this technique is not able to fully capture the structure of the turbulent layer above a city. Aim of this study is to evaluate the importance for meteorological and air quality simulations, of properly capture the dynamic and thermodynamic surface exchanges in urban areas. Two sets of simulations were performed over the city of Athens (Greece): a first using a mesoscale model with a detailed urban surface exchange parameterisation (able to reproduce the surface exchanges better than the traditional method), and a second with the traditional approach. Meteorological outputs are passed to a Eulerian photochemical model (the photochemical model is run offline). Comparison with measurements shows better agreement for the simulation with the detailed parameterisation. The differences between the simulations concern, mainly, wind speed (maximum difference of 0.5-1 m s(-1)), night-time temperatures (2-3degreesC), turbulence intensity (2 m(2) s(-2)) and heat fluxes (0.15 K m s(-1)) over the urban area, urban nocturnal land breeze intensity, timing and extension of sea breeze. These differences modify the Pollutant distribution (e.g. for ozone maximum differences are of the order of 30 ppb). Differences between the simulations are also found in AOT60 values (inside and outside the city) and in O(3) chemical regimes. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available