4.7 Article

Compositional and interlake variability of zooplankton affect baseline stable isotope signatures

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 1977-1987

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1977

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zooplankton are commonly used to establish a baseline isotopic signature for pelagic production in lakes. Our objective was to evaluate this approach by quantifying among-lake and within-lake variability of delta(13)C and delta(15)N for different taxa of pelagic zooplankton. We measured the delta(13)C and delta(15)N of Daphnia, Holopedium, and calanoid copepods from four lakes sampled from June to November 2001 and from eight additional takes sampled once in midsummer. In the four lakes with temporal sampling, within-lake differences due to taxonomic grouping accounted for 36.7% of the variance in delta(15)N and 41.7% of the variance in delta(13)C. Among all lakes, the delta(15)N of calanoid copepods was on average 2.55parts per thousand and 2.44parts per thousand higher than Daphnia or Holopedium, respectively, whereas the delta(13)C of calanoid copepods was 2.19parts per thousand and 2.23parts per thousand lower than Daphnia or Holopedium, respectively. If N-15 fractionation is similar among species, the differences in delta(15)N suggest that calanoid copepods either feed at a higher trophic position in the food web or they have a consistently higher baseline delta(15)N signature than Daphnia or Holopedium among lakes. Differences in delta(13)C suggest that zooplankton taxa in the pelagia of lakes have different food sources. We conclude that species composition and feeding behaviors of the zooplankton community should be considered before making among-lake comparisons of food web structure. We show that Daphnia is a useful isotopic baseline for organisms that rely on primary production in lakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available