4.6 Article

Drought indices and their application to East Africa

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 1335-1357

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/joc.931

Keywords

East Africa drought indices; Palmer drought severity index; Bhalme-Mooley index; standardized precipitation index; precipitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analysed and modified (where necessary) the properties of three drought indices: the Palmer drought severity index (PDSI), the Bhalme-Mooley index (BMI) and the standardized precipitation index (SPI). We modified the original PDSI's recursive formula, potential runoff, and Z index, which produced more realistic results than the original PDSI (designed for the USA) for East Africa. We improved the SPI by first using a plotting position formula designed for the Pearson type III (P3) distribution to transform the 'smoothed' precipitation data into non-exceedance probabilities, which we then transformed into standard P3 variates by the regional flood index method. The modified SPI depicted East Africa's drought conditions more accurately than the original SPI. Using the three indices and East Africa as a case example, we identified eight assessment criteria to determine the most appropriate index for detecting drought events on a regional basis. BMI produced results that are highly correlated to those of the modified PDSI, which suggested that precipitation alone could explain most of the variability of East African droughts. Furthermore, among the three indices, SPI is more appropriate for monitoring East African droughts because it is more easily adapted to the local climate, has modest data requirements, can be computed at almost any time scale, provides relatively consistent power spectra spatially, has no theoretical upper or lower bounds, and is easy to interpret. Copyright (C) 2003 Royal Meteorological Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available