4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Analytical and functional characterization of ultrathin carbon coatings for future magnetic storage devices

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 1135-1139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00854-5

Keywords

filtered high current pulsed arc; carbon overcoat; thin film analysis; areal storage density; magnetic storage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrathin protective carbon coatings (5 nm) on top of magnetic hard disks deposited by filtered high current pulsed arc (HCA) were analyzed by various techniques. The films were compared to currently employed magnetron sputtered CNx overcoats in terms of functionality-determining film properties. X-Ray reflectivity (XRR) was used to determine film thicknesses and has been proved to be accurately applicable to carbon coatings down to similar to1 nm thickness. Time of flight-secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) sputter depth profiling has proved similar carbon penetration depths into the underlying magnetic media, both for HCA deposition and magnetron sputtering (MS), in spite of considerably higher deposition energies occurring during the HCA process. This fact suggests no negative impact on the macroscopic magnetic properties due to HCA deposition. The minimum thicknesses for full coverage of the media were evaluated by applying X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to the different film types. The results show a coverage limit of similar to1.0 nm for HCA coatings in contrast to similar to2.0-3.0 nm for CNx coatings indicating a significantly improved corrosion performance for overcoat thicknesses below 3 mm. Characterization with an AFM-based Nanoscratching technique suggests a more than two times increased resistivity against plastic deformation for HCA films compared to magnetron sputtered CNx overcoats. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available