4.2 Article

Cross dating (Th/U-14C) of calcite covering prehistoric paintings in Borneo

Journal

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 172-179

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0033-5894(03)00064-4

Keywords

Th/U dating; C-14 dating; open system; prehistoric paintings; cave rock art; Borneo; Kalimantan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first application of cross-dating (Th/U measured by thermo-ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) and C-14 measured by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS)) of calcite covering prehistoric paintings. Th/U age estimates of cave drapery range from 9800 to 27,300 yr B.P. while conventional 14 C age is estimated between 9900 and 7610 yr B.P. depending on the dead carbon correction. The age discrepancy is attributed to a disturbance of Th/U and/or C-14 geochemical systems, showing the limits of the geochronological approach applied to this kind of material. For the Th/U system, the poor consistency of U data (U content, U-234/U-238 activity ratios) and apparent ages argue for open system conditions. For 14C System, variation of the dead carbon fraction (dcf) and a possible mixing of successive generations of calcite could account for age discrepancy. Nevertheless, one sample shows concordant ages for the two methods. Compatible ages through corrections for open system conditions are assumed for other samples. Then, the cross-dating suggests 9900 yr as the minimum age of the piece of drapery; the underlying painting must be older. This study of rock art demonstrates the presence of a Pleistocene population before 9900 yr in the southeast of Borneo, whereas previously the only population in evidence in this area was of Austronesian type from similar to5000 to 6000 yrs ago. (C) 2003 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available