4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Interim results from a cluster randomized controlled oral cancer screening trial in Kerala, India

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 580-588

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1368-8375(03)00041-1

Keywords

oral cancer; screening; early detection; oral visual inspection; randomized trial; control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cluster randomized controlled oral cancer screening trial is on-going in the Trivandrum district, India, to evaluate the efficacy of screening in reducing oral cancer mortality. Subjects, aged 35 years and above, in 13 clusters in the Trivandrum district, India, were randomized to the intervention (screening) group (7 clusters, 78,969 subjects) to receive three rounds of screening by oral visual inspection by trained health workers at 3-year intervals or to a control group (6 clusters, 74,739 subjects). Two rounds of screening were completed between 1995 and 2002 during which 69,896 (88.5%) subjects were screened at least once, and 59.7% of the 4408 screen-positive subjects were further investigated. In the intervention group, 344,404 person-years were accrued and 329,326 person-years were in the control group. In the intervention group, 149 incident oral cancer cases and 65 deaths from oral cancer were observed, and 106 incident cases and 62 deaths from oral cancer were observed in the control group. The programme sensitivity for detection of oral precancerous lesions and cancer was 81.5% and the programme specificity was 84.8%; the programme positive predictive value was 39.6%. In the intervention group 37.6% of the cases were in stages I-II, as opposed to 18.9% in the control group. The 3 year survival rate was 57.5% in the intervention and 38.8% in the control group (P < 0.05). The age standardized oral cancer mortality rates were 21.2/100,000 person-years in the intervention and 21.3/100,000 in the control group. After completing two rounds of screening, oral cancer mortality rates were similar in both study groups. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available