4.3 Article

Classifying the findings in qualitative studies

Journal

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 905-923

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1049732303253488

Keywords

qualitative findings; qualitative metasynthesis; quality criteria; typology of findings

Funding

  1. NINR NIH HHS [NR04907, R01 NR004907] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key task in conducting research integration studies is determining what features to account for in the research reports eligible for inclusion. In the course of a methodological project, the authors found a remarkable uniformity in the way findings were produced and presented, no matter what the stated or implied frame of reference or method. They describe a typology of findings, which they developed to bypass the discrepancy between method claims and the actual use of methods, and efforts to ascertain its utility and reliability. The authors propose that the findings in journal reports of qualitative studies in the health domain can be classified on a continuum of data transformation as no finding, topical survey, thematic survey, conceptual/thematic description, or interpretive explanation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available