4.3 Review

Palaeoclimatic and archaeological evidence for a ∼200-yr recurrence of floods and droughts linking California, Mesoamerica and South America over the past 2000 years

Journal

HOLOCENE
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 763-778

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/0959683603hl661rp

Keywords

flood; drought; climatic change; solar variability; periodicity; teleconnection; cultural transition; Holocene; Santa Barbara Basin; California; Mesoamerica; South America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conspicuous grey, clay-rich flood deposits in the predominantly olive, varved sediment in the central Santa Barbara Basin, California, were dated via varve-counting to c. AD 212, 440, 603, 1029, 1418 and 1605. The similar to 200-yr quasi-periodicity and the timing of individual floods match time periods of known supraregional climatic changes and the documented similar to200-yr periodicity in palaeoclimate records elsewhere. The floods of c. ad 440 and ad 1418 occurred during global reorganizations of atmospheric circulation. Cold spells seem to have accompanied the floods of c. AD 1029 and ad 1605. California floods and other palaeoclimate records suggest that expressions of regional climates are modulated by solar variability with a similar to 200-yr periodicity. Our compilation of palaeoclimatic and Mesoamerican and South American archaeological records provides evidence that palaeoenvironmental and cultural changes were often coincident within their respective dating uncertainties and occurred in similar to 200-yr steps. The matching pattern supports the hypothesis that manifestations of changing climates, such as drought or flooding, served as destabilizing cofactors in transitions of precolumbian cultures. Extrapolation of the similar to 200-yr recurrence pattern of Santa Barbara flooding suggests that catastrophic flooding in southern California may be expected for the early part of this century.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available