4.8 Article

Silibinin protects mice from T cell-dependent liver injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 333-340

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00239-3

Keywords

silibinin; T cells; liver injury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Silibinin is the major pharmacologically active compound of the Silybum marianum fruit extract silymarin. Its well-known hepatoprotective activities are mostly explained by antioxidative properties, inhibition of phosphatidylcholine synthesis or stimulation of hepatic RNA and protein synthesis. Here, we characterized the hepatoprotective potential of silibinin as an immune-response modifier in T cell-dependent hepatitis in vivo. Methods: Silibinin was tested in the mouse model of concanavalin A (ConA)-induced, T cell-dependent hepatitis. Liver injury was assessed by quantification of plasma transaminase activities and intrahepatic DNA fragmentation. Plasma cytokine concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), intrahepatic cytokine and inducible NO synthase (iNOS) mRNA levels by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, intrahepatic iNOS expression by immunofluorescent staining, and intrahepatic nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) activation by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Results: Silibinin significantly inhibited ConA-induced liver disease. Silibinin proved to be an immune-response modifier in vivo, inhibiting intrahepatic expression of tumor necrosis factor, interferon-gamma, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-2, and iNOS, and augmenting synthesis of IL-10. In addition, silibinin inhibited intrahepatic activation of NF-kappaB. Conclusions: Silibinin, suppressing T cell-dependent liver injury as an immune-response modifier, might be a valuable drug in therapeutic situations in which intrahepatic immunosuppression is required. (C) 2003 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available