4.4 Article

Assessment of IL-1β and VEGF concentration in a rat model during orthodontic tooth movement and extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Journal

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 142-150

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.09.012

Keywords

Orthodontic movement; Shock wave; Cytokine; Periodontal ligament (PDL)

Funding

  1. LAZAROFF fund for research in maxillofacial surgery - Technion
  2. Israel Institute of Technology
  3. Israel Orthodontic Society (IOS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aimed to investigate PDL's cytokine concentration fluctuations after induction of orthodontic force with and without extracorporeal shock wave therapy in a rat model. Materials and methods: An orthodontic appliance was fabricated and applied between the molars and the incisors of rats. The rats were treated by a single episode of 1000 shock waves and gingival crevicular fluid was collected for 3 days. The expression and concentration of IL-1 beta and VEGF were evaluated by ELISA assay. On day 3 all rats were sacrificed and histologic and immunohistochemical assays were applied. Results: IL-1 beta concentration rose in both the treated and non treated shockwave groups on the first day, however it was statistically significantly higher in the treated group on day 2. No statistically significant difference was detected between the groups on day 3. The number/area of TRAP positive cells was higher in the non shockwave group than in the treated group. The percentage of cells expressing VEGF displayed the opposite trend. The findings regarding the immunohistochemical assay for IL-1 beta corresponded with those of the ELISA assay on day 3. Conclusion: The application of shockwaves during orthodontic tooth movement influences the expression of IL-1 beta and VEGF and may alternate the periodontal remodelling expected rate. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available