4.5 Article

Interaction of levosimendan with cardiac troponin C in the presence of cardiac troponin I peptides

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 1055-1061

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2828(03)00178-0

Keywords

cardiac troponin C; cardiac troponin I; calcium sensitizer; NMR; drug interaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between troponin C (Tnc) and troponin I (TnI) is essential for the regulation of muscle contraction. There are several binding sites for TnI on TnC that are differentially occupied depending on the phase of the contraction/relaxation cycle. TnI and TnC interact in an antiparallel fashion with each other. The C-domain of cTnC and the N-domain region of cTnI (residues 33-70) always interact under physiological conditions, whereas the interaction between regulatory regions of TnC and TnI (residues 128-166) is calcium dependent. Previously, it has been shown that levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer used as a treatment for acute heart failure, can interact with both domains of isolated cTnC. To understand which interaction is relevant for the mechanism of calcium sensitization, we used a more complete troponin model obtained by complexing cTnI(32-79) and cTnI(128-180) with calcium-saturated cTn(CS). The cTnI peptides bound to cTnC(CS) to form a 1:1:1 complex. The interaction of levosimendan with this complex was followed by H-1-N-15 heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. It was clear that based on chemical shift changes, cTnI(32-79), blocked the levosimendan interaction sites on the C-domain, whereas cTnI(128-180) did not compete with levosimendan for the binding site on the N-domain. Hence, the effective binding site of levosimendan on cTnC resulting in the calcium-sensitizing effect is located in the regulatory domain (N-domain). (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available