4.3 Article

Serum hyaluronate correlates with histological progression in alcoholic liver disease

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 945-950

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200309000-00002

Keywords

alcoholic liver disease; liver cirrhosis; fibrosis; hyaluronate; extracellular matrix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Chronic alcohol consumption may lead to the development of liver cirrhosis. Serum concentrations of hyaluronate were suggested as a predictor in chronic liver disease, but its power to distinguish between severity of fibrosis and inflammation had not been assessed. In order to evaluate hyaluronate as a marker to detect early stages of alcoholic liver disease and to establish a possible correlation with hepatic histology, serum concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay in 87 patients with biopsy-proven fatty liver, fatty liver and mild fibrosis, fatty liver and inflammation, severe fibrosis and inflammation, and cirrhosis, and in 12 non-alcoholic control subjects. In addition, serum hyaluronate was determined in 40 non-cirrhotic alcoholic patients with either a normal serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or an AST elevated at least two-fold. Results Serum hyaluronate increased significantly with advanced stages of alcoholic liver disease, while levels in patients with fatty liver were elevated only slightly without reaching significance. Hyaluronate correlated well with histological stage and was highly sensitive for detecting fibrosis in general and perivenular fibrosis as an indicator of progression to cirrhosis. Hyaluronate levels were not influenced by AST levels. Conclusion Serum hyaluronate is a good predictor of the presence of even moderate hepatic fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease, justifying its clinical use to assess morphological alterations of the liver in alcoholics. (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available