4.4 Article

Lubricin in human temporomandibular joint disc: An immunohistochemical study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages 614-619

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.12.004

Keywords

Temporomandibular joint; Disc; Chondrocyte; Lubricin; Osteoarthritis; Proteoglycan 4 (PRG4); Superficial zone protein (SZP)

Funding

  1. University of Catania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate, immunohistochemically, the presence and distribution of lubricin in human temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discs without any degenerative changes, obtained from autopsies, in order to elucidate the TMJ lubrication system and disc tribology. Methods: Immunohistochemistry for lubricin detection was carried out on 34 TMJ discs. Any disc had signs of degenerative or inflammatory joint disease nor disc were displaced. Sections were incubated with diluted rabbit polyclonal anti-lubricin antibody and scored according to the percentage of lubricin immunopositive cells. Three different TMJ disc tissue compartments taken from the intermediate zone were analysed, namely: the central region as well as the temporal (superior) and condylar (inferior) disc surfaces. The Friedman test, was used to compare lubricin at a protein level expression, amongst the regions of disc specimens. Results: Staining was noted within the TMJ disc cell populations in every disc tissue sample, however, the number of disc cells immunolabelled varied according to disc tissue regions. The percentage of immunostained cells, was statistically significant lower in the central region than in each disc surface (p < 0.0001), whilst any statistically significant difference was found when comparing the two surfaces one another. Conclusions: Lubricin is present in several location of TMJ disc being significantly more expressed at disc surfaces than in the central part. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available