4.0 Article

Antibodies to the atherosclerotic plaque components beta2-glycoprotein I and heat-shock proteins as risk factors for acute cerebral ischemia

Journal

ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA
Volume 61, Issue 3B, Pages 757-763

Publisher

ASSOC ARQUIVOS DE NEURO- PSIQUIATRIA
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500010

Keywords

anti-beta2-gpl antibodies; anti-Hsp 60/65 antibodies; acute cerebral ischemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One third of cases of cerebral ischemia have no clear etiology. A humoral response to the atherosclerotic plaques components beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-gpl) and heat-shock proteins (Hsp) might be involved in the pathogenesis of stroke. This case-control study includes a complete profile of anti-beta2-gpl antibodies and testing of IgG antibodies to the 60/65 kilodaltons (kDa) Hsp in stroke patients. Ninety-three patients with acute ischemic stroke and 93 controls were evaluated for age, sex, race, hypertension, smoking, previous cardiopathy, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia and previous history of cerebral ischemia. IgG/IgM/IgA anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2-gpl antibodies, as well as IgG antibodies to human 60 kDa Hsp and to Mycobacterium bovis 65 kDa Hsp, were detected by immunoassay. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated by logistic regression. The adjusted OR for IgA anti-beta2-gpl antibodies was 4.6 (90%CI 1.5 to 14.3; p = 0.025). The non-adjusted OR for IgG antibodies to Hsp 60 was 26.1. The adjusted OR for IgG antibodies to Hsp 65 was 3.2 (90%CI 1.2 to 8.3; p = 0.044). The adjusted OR for IgG to any Hsp (60 or 65) was 4.8 (90%CI 1.9 to 12.1; p = 0.006). This study demonstrates that elevated IgA anti-beta2-gpl and IgG anti-Hsp 60/65 antibodies are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke. The association occurred independently of other risk factors. This humoral response might link autoimmunity, thrombophilia and atherosclerosis in stroke patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available