4.5 Article

The polysaccharide capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans interferes with human dendritic cell maturation and activation

Journal

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 370-378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.1002476

Keywords

GM-CSF; interleukin-4; major histocompatibility complex; glucuronoxylomannan

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [1R03TW01201-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of encapsulated and acapsular strains of Cryptococcus neoformans to activate dendritic cells (DC) derived from monocytes stimulated with granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor and interleukin-4 was evaluated. Profound differences in DC response to encapsulated and acapsular C. neoformans strains were observed. In particular, (i) the acapsular strain was easily phagocytosed by immature DC, and the process induced several molecular markers, such as major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class 11, CD40, and CD83, which are characteristic of mature DC; (ii) the encapsulated strain did not up-regulate MHC class I and class 11 and CD83 molecules; (iii) the soluble capsular polysaccharide glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) is unable to regulate MHC class I and class 11 molecules; (iv) the addition of monoclonal antibody to GXM (anti-GXM) to the encapsulated strain facilitated antigen-presenting cell maturation by promoting ingestion of C. neoformans via Fe receptor for immunoglobulin G (FcgammaR)II (CD32) and FcgammaRIII (CD16); (v) perturbation of FcRgammaII or FcgammaRIII was insufficient to promote DC maturation; and (vi) optimal DC maturation permitted efficient T cell activation and differentiation, as documented by the enhancement of lymphoproliferation and interferon-gamma production. These results indicate that the C. neoformons capsule interferes with DC activation and maturation, indicating a new pathway by which the fungus may avoid an efficient T cell response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available