4.7 Article

Estrogen receptor β mediates the inhibitory effect of estradiol on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 734-744

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00496-6

Keywords

atherosclerosis; gene expression; hormones; receptors; smooth muscle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: It has been demonstrated that 17beta-estradiol (E2) has an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) through an estrogen receptor (ER)-dependent pathway, Both ER subtypes, classical ER (ERalpha) and the newly identified ER subtype (ERbeta), are expressed in VSMCs. However, it remains unknown which receptor plays the critical role in the inhibitory effect on VSMC proliferation. Methods and results: We constructed replication-deficient adenoviruses bearing the coding region of human ERalpha, ERbeta, and the dominant-negative form of ERbeta (designated AxCAERalpha, AxCAERbeta, and AxCADNERbeta, respectively). Prior to infection with the adenoviruses, 100 nmol/l E2 attenuated DNA synthesis by up to 14% and transactivated the estrogen-induced expression of the desired mRNA in rat VSMCs. This was accompanied by increased transcriptional activity of estrogen responsive element in response to E2, and the increase was comparable between AxCAERalpha and AxCAERbeta. When VSMCs were infected with AxCAERbeta at a multiplicity of infection of 5 or higher, DNA synthesis as well as cell number decreased by 50% in response to E2, and the effect was abolished by co-infection with AxCADNERbeta. In contrast, when VSMCs were infected with xCAERalpha, the reduction in DNA synthesis was minimal. Conclusions: Our results indicate that ERP is more potent than ERalpha in the inhibitory effect on VSMC proliferation. (C) 2003 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available