4.5 Article

Arterial transit time imaging with flow encoding arterial spin tagging (FEAST)

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 599-607

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10559

Keywords

arterial spin labeling (ASL); cerebral blood flow (CBF); tissue transit time; flow encoding arterial spin tagging (FEAST); functional brain imaging

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD39621] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA015149] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging provides direct and absolute measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Arterial transit time is a related physiological parameter reflecting the duration for the labeled spins to reach the brain region of interest. Most of the existing ASL approaches to assess arterial transit time rely on multiple measurements at various postlabeling delay times, and thus are vulnerable to motion artifact as well as computational error. We describe the use of flow encoding arterial spin tagging (FEAST) technique to measure tissue transit time, which can be derived from the ratio between the ASL signals measured with and without appropriate bipolar gradients. In the present study, we provided a theoretical framework and carried out an experimental validation during steady-state imaging. The global mean tissue transit time was similar to1100 and 1400 ms for two conditions of bipolar gradients with specific encoding velocity (Venc) of 29 and 8 mm/sec, respectively. The mean tissue transit time measured within cerebral vascular territories was shortest in the deep middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. Application of the FEAST technique in two patients with cerebrovascular disease demonstrated prolonged tissue transit times in the affected vascular territories which were consistent with results from other MR imaging modalities. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available