4.5 Article

Rises in whole muscle passive tension of mammalian muscle after eccentric contractions at different lengths

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 3, Pages 1224-1234

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00163.2003

Keywords

eccentric exercise; muscle damage; sarcomeres; contracture; compliance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This is a report of experiments carried out on the medial gastrocnemius muscle of the anesthetized cat, investigating the effects of eccentric contractions carried out at different muscle lengths on the passive and active length-tension relationships. In one series of experiments, the motor supply to the muscle was divided into three approximately equal parts; in the other, whole muscles were used. Fifty eccentric contractions were carried out over different regions of the active length-tension curve for each partial or whole muscle. Active and passive length-tension curves were measured before and after the eccentric contractions. When eccentric contractions were carried out at longer lengths, there was a larger shift of the optimum length for active tension in the direction of longer muscle lengths and a larger fall in peak isometric tension. Passive tension was higher immediately after the eccentric contractions, and if the muscle was left undisturbed for 40 min, it increased further to higher values, particularly after contractions at longer lengths. A series of 20 passive stretches of the same speed and amplitude and covering the same length range as the active stretches, reduced the passive tension which redeveloped over a subsequent 40-min period. It is hypothesized that there are two factors influencing the level of passive tension in a muscle after a series of eccentric contractions. One is injury contractures in damaged muscle fibers tending to raise passive tension; the other is the presence of disrupted sarcomeres in series with still-functioning sarcomeres tending to reduce it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available