3.9 Article

Bacterial Dispersal Associated With Speech in the Setting of Intravitreous Injections

Journal

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 12, Pages 1551-1554

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.227

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the amount of bacterial dispersal associated with speech in a simulated intravitreous injection. Methods: Fifteen volunteers were recruited. Each volunteer was positioned over an open blood agar plate and did the following: read a 5-minute script with a face mask, read a 5-minute script without a face mask, read a 5-minute script with the face turned away from the plate without a face mask, and stood in silence for 5 minutes. Each volunteer then read a 5-minute script while reclined in a standard ophthalmic examination chair with an open blood agar plate secured to the forehead to simulate bacterial dispersal associated with a talking patient. Total numbers of colony-forming bacteria per plate were counted, and the bacteria were identified. Results: Significantly less bacterial growth occurred in the face mask and silence conditions compared with the no face mask condition (both P<.001). Bacterial growth was significantly greater in the reclined condition compared with the room control (P=.02). Oral streptococcal species represented 66.7% to 82.6% of bacterial colonies in the no face mask, face turned, and reclined conditions. Conclusions: During simulated intravitreous injection, wearing a face mask or remaining silent significantly decreases culture plate contamination from talking. Talking from above and talking in the reclined position were associated with a significant increase in culture plate contamination. Physicians performing intravitreous injections should be aware of these patterns of bacterial contamination, should consider either wearing a face mask or minimizing speech, and should encourage patients to minimize speech during the procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available