4.6 Article

Soy food consumption is associated with lower risk of coronary heart disease in Chinese women

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 133, Issue 9, Pages 2874-2878

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.9.2874

Keywords

soy food; coronary heart disease; women; Chinese

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA70867] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soy food intake has been shown to have beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Data directly linking soy food intake to clinical outcomes of cardiovascular disease, however, are sparse. We examined the relationship between soy food intake and incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) among participants in the Shanghai Women's Health Study, a population-based prospective cohort study of similar to75,000 Chinese women aged 40-70 y at the baseline survey that was conducted from 1997 to 2000. Included in this study were 64,915 women without previously diagnosed CHD, stroke, cancer and diabetes at baseline. Information on usual intake of soy foods was obtained at baseline through an in-person interview using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Cohort members were followed biennially through in-person interviews. After a mean of 2.5 y (162,277 person-years) of follow-up, 62 incident cases of CHD (43 nonfatal myocardial infarctions and 19 CHD deaths) were documented. There was a clear monotonic dose-response relationship between soy food intake and risk of total CHD (P for trend = 0.003) with an adjusted relative risk (RR) of 0.25 (95% Cl, 0.10-0.63) observed for women in the highest vs. the lowest quartile of total soy protein intake. The inverse association was more pronounced for nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR = 0.14; 95% Cl, 0.04-0.48 for the highest vs. the lowest quartile of intake; P for trend = 0.001). This study provides, for the first time, direct evidence that soy food consumption may reduce the risk of CHD in women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available