4.8 Review

Preparation, physical properties, on-bead binding assay and spectroscopic reliability of 25 barcoded polystyrene-poly(ethylene glycol) graft copolymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 125, Issue 35, Pages 10546-10560

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja035665q

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we describe the preparation of 25 beaded polystyrene - poly(ethylene glycol) graft copolymers from six spectroscopically active styrene monomers: styrene, 2,5-dimethylstyrene, 4-methylstyrene, 2,4-dimethylstyrene, 4-tert-butylstyrene, and 3-methylstyrene. These polymers were thoroughly characterized by Raman, infrared, and H-1/C-13 NMR spectroscopies, and differential scanning calorimetry. Determination of the swelling properties, peptide synthesis, and on-bead streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (SAP) binding assay further established that their physical and chemical properties where not significantly altered by the diversity of their encoded polystyrene core. Each of the 25 resins displayed a unique Raman and infrared vibrational fingerprint, which was converted into a spectroscopic barcode. The position of each bar matches the peak wavenumber in the corresponding spectrum but is independent of its intensity. From this simplified representation similarity maps comparing 35 000 resin pairs were generated to establish the spectroscopic barcoding as a reliable encoding methodology. In effect, in 99% of the cases, the highest similarity coefficients were obtained for resin pairs prepared from the same styrene derivatives even after SAP binding assay. We have also shown that a small but unique combination of a resin's vibrations (30-40%) is sufficient for its identification. However, in rare cases where a resin's vibrational signature has been severely compromised, both the Raman and infrared barcodes were synergistically and reliably utilized to unequivocally identify its chemical make up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available