4.7 Article

Selective regulation of gene expression by nuclear factor 110, a member of the NF90 family of double-stranded RNA-binding proteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 332, Issue 1, Pages 85-98

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00885-4

Keywords

NF90; NF110; DRBP76; ILF3; NFAR

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI34552] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Members of the nuclear factor 90 (NF90) family of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-binding proteins have been implicated in several biological processes including the regulation of gene expression. cDNA sequences predict that the proteins have a functional nuclear localization signal and two dsRNA-binding motifs (dsRBMs), and are identical at their N termini. Isoforms are predicted to diverge at their C termini as well as by the insertion of four amino acid residues (NVKQ) between the two dsRBMs. In this study, we verified the expression of four of the isoforms by cDNA cloning and mass spectrometric analysis of proteins isolated from human cells. Cell fractionation studies showed that NF90 and its heteromeric partner, NF45, are predominantly nuclear and largely chromatin-associated. The C-terminally extended NF90 species, NF110, are almost exclusively chromatin-bound. Both NF110 isoforms are more active than NF90 isoforms in stimulating transcription from the proliferating cell nuclear antigen reporter in a transient expression system. NF110b, which carries the NVKQ insert, was identified as the strongest activator. It stimulated transcription of some, but not all, promoters in a fashion that suggested that it functions in concert with other transcription factors. Finally, we demonstrate that NF110b associates with the dsRBM-containing transcriptional co-activator, RNA helicase A, independently of RNA binding. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available