4.0 Article

Lifetime risk of coronary heart disease by cholesterol levels at selected ages

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 163, Issue 16, Pages 1966-1972

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.16.1966

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-25195, K23 HL04253] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We sought to assess how cholesterol levels at different ages modify the remaining lifetime risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: We included all Framingham Heart Study participants examined from 1971 through 1996 who did not have CHD and were not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. At index ages of 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 years, participants were stratified by total cholesterol level and by cholesterol subfractions. Lifetime risk of CHD was calculated with death free of CHD as a competing event. Results: Among 3269 men and 4019 women, 1120 developed CHD and 1365 died free of CHD during followup. At each index age, lifetime risk of CHD increased with higher cholesterol levels, and time to event decreased. At age 40 years, the lifetime risks of CHD through age 80 years for men with total cholesterol levels less than 200 mg/dL (<5.20 mmol/L), 200 to 239 mg/dL (5.20-6.19 mmol/L), and 240 mg/dL or greater (greater than or equal to6.20 mmol/L), respectively, were 31%, 43%, and 57%; for women, the lifetime risks were 15%, 26%, and 33%, respectively. Lifetime risks contrasted sharply with shorter-term risks: at age 40 years, the 10-year cumulative risks of CHD were 3%, 5%, and 12% for men, and 1%, 2%, and 5% for women, respectively. Conclusions: Lifetime risk of CHD increases sharply with higher total cholesterol levels for men and women at all ages. These data support an important role for cholesterol screening in younger patients, and they may help target high-risk patients for lifestyle modification or drug therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available