4.0 Article

Safety and Tolerability of the γ-Secretase Inhibitor Avagacestat in a Phase 2 Study of Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease

Journal

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 11, Pages 1430-1440

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.2194

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Elan Pharmaceuticals
  3. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy
  4. Pfizer Inc
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Baxter Pharmaceuticals
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Medivation, Inc
  9. National Institute of Aging and Alzheimer's Association
  10. Eisai
  11. Genentech
  12. Bayer
  13. GE
  14. NIA Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
  15. NIA Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network
  16. Alzheimer's Association
  17. Norman and Rosalie Fain Family Foundation
  18. John and Happy White Foundation
  19. Champlin Foundation
  20. Academy of Finland
  21. Abbot
  22. Astellas
  23. Biogen Idec
  24. Chiesi
  25. Merck
  26. Toyama
  27. Abbott
  28. Astra-Zeneca
  29. Forest
  30. Epix
  31. Johnson Johnson
  32. Lundbeck
  33. Novartis
  34. Organon
  35. Otsuka
  36. Praecis
  37. sanofi-aventis
  38. Shire
  39. Solvay
  40. Sunovion
  41. Takeda
  42. Targacept

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the gamma-secretase inhibitor avagacestat in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD). Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week phase 2 study. Setting: Global, multicenter trial. Patients: A total of 209 outpatients with mild to moderate AD were randomized into the double-blind treatment phase. The median age of the patients was 75 years, 58.9% were APOE epsilon 4 carriers, and baseline measures of disease severity were similar among groups. Intervention: Avagacestat, 25, 50, 100, or 125 mg daily, or placebo administered orally daily. Main Outcome Measures: Safety and tolerability of avagacestat. Results: Discontinuation rates for the 25-mg and 50-mg doses of avagacestat were comparable with placebo but were higher in the 100-mg and 125-mg dose groups. Trends for worsening cognition, as measured by change from baseline Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale score, were observed in the 100-mg and 125-mg dose groups. Treatment-emergent serious ad-verse events were similar across placebo and treatment groups. The most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events, predominantly gastrointestinal and dermatologic. Other adverse events occurring more frequently in patients undergoing treatment included reversible glycosuria (without associated serum glucose changes), nonmelanoma skin cancer, and asymptomatic magnetic resonance imaging findings. Exploratory cerebrospinal fluid amyloid isoforms and tau biomarker analysis demonstrated dose-dependent but not statistically significant reductions in a small subset of patients. Conclusions: Avagacestat dosed at 25 and 50 mg daily was relatively well tolerated and had low discontinuation rates. The 100-mg and 125-mg dose arms were poorly tolerated with trends for cognitive worsening. Exploratory cerebrospinal fluid biomarker substudies provide preliminary support for gamma-secretase target engagement, but additional studies are warranted to better characterize pharmacodynamic effects at the 25- and 50-mg doses. This study establishes an acceptable safety and tolerability dose range for future avagacestat studies in AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available