4.0 Article

Low Serum Vitamin D Levels and Recurrent Inflammatory Spinal Cord Disease

Journal

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 352-356

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.1974

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Teva Neuroscience
  3. Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation
  4. Biogen Idec
  5. Greater Good Foundation
  6. DioGenix
  7. Amplimmune
  8. Accelerated Cure Project
  9. Genzyme
  10. Genentech
  11. Alexion
  12. National Institutes of Health
  13. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  14. Nancy Davis Foundation
  15. EMD Serono
  16. Vertex
  17. Abbott
  18. Bayer
  19. ApoPharma Inc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels have been associated with a higher risk of developing multiple sclerosis and increased relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis. As a sterol hormone involved in multiple immunologic pathways, vitamin D may play a role in preventing monophasic immune-mediated central nervous system attacks from developing into recurrent disease. Objective: To investigate the association between low serum vitamin D levels and recurrent spinal cord disease. Design, Setting, and Patients: We performed a retrospective analysis at Johns Hopkins Transverse Myelitis Center, Baltimore, Maryland, evaluating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in 77 patients with monophasic and recurrent inflammatory diseases of the spinal cord. Main Outcome Measure: Levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results: Vitamin D levels are significantly lower in patients who developed recurrent spinal cord disease, adjusting for season, age, sex, and race. Conclusions: This study provides a basis for a prospective trial of measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in these patient populations and assessing the influence of vitamin D supplementation on the frequency of relapses in those with recurrent inflammatory spinal cord disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available